@Anonymous #5F71
Where is this from?
@Dex Stewart
It’s odd. I remember them also saying in that they’d delete some of the meme pics when I showed them to Nebbie for in the clarification of rule 0 thread, including possibly entire a category they had for years. I’m trying to remember what it was but think of
a category like this
@RD8K
>showing kids what really happen within the holocausts
Not interested in trading one set of crazy politics for another.
@sapphie
You know, I can perhaps see that. Not sure if I could but I get using it as background noise/boring entertainment for the sake of it (no offense to any that find it fun.)
@Anonymous #A543
I don’t think supporting a DNP/takedown system is purely out of entitlement. I mean, that was the main forum of resistance in the first place. It’s the traditional right of artist to be able to control their work but the problem we have now is that, so much of our cultural output in today’s world is based upon those rules being ignored or weakened. Should JJ be able to nuke Ask Princess Molestia from the web for example? Say, he decides to nuke it from here and Derpi, sure he may own copyright (ignoring hasbro), but it was also at the center of a major controversy and is arguably historic, so to take a takedown request in its fullest extent would not only nuke the blog but a record of history that has itself been used in memes and referenced everywhere. Something like that shouldn’t be memory holed, yet that fully possible under current law.