…No? Is that meant to be a parody of what I’ve said?
What I said is not hard to conceptualize or believe; you need only look at Jewish history to understand their nature, and the forces which shaped them.
Consider a people with no homeland, essentially nomads with no place to call their own.
So, they move to another land, and try to settle there.
Do they breed and intermingle with the natives there? Well, then, they cease to be ‘them’ - that tribe has ended, swallowed up by the natives as a distant genetic memory. That group effectively died out, like a pinch of salt in a bucket of water.
Okay, so another group of this tribe moves elsewhere, and does not mingle - it keeps to itself, keeping strong racial ties, making its own little community among strangers. Do they survive? Well, maybe; but that breeds suspicion among the ‘Them’ outside, and the ‘Them’ outside see the new, strange looking people as increasingly strange and threatening, heightening insularity. Odds are, they get wiped out or otherwise ousted, ran out of the area. Certainly they will not thrive.
So, third group (or perhaps just this second group fleeing); this one still highly favors its own and has a keen interest in keeping its bloodline going - it doesn’t want to mix with the other outsiders - but it is also quite aware that outsider’s self-interest competes with its own, and that a strongly unified ‘Them’ will fuck them over. So, besides being insular and keeping to their own, they seek to break down the other group - to pit them against each other, erode their unity, whatever it takes so they aren’t singled out as a foreign ‘Them’. Well, that’s suddenly a lot more successful. The group operates in favor of its own, while working to convince the ‘Them’ around them that they’re really no different, they’re all the same, they’re no threat, or by pitting the other sub-groups against one another…
This group is successful at surviving; indeed, it works quite well. But what if it begins to take advantage of the ‘Them’ around them? It can leverage more power by being, shall we say, less than honest and honorable. It can shave the edges off of coins, for instance; or it can poison ‘Them’s wells to get more money for their doctors, etc. And so, in time, the advantage conferred by being dishonest becomes genetically favorable, and the ones that are the most successfully dishonest are more likely to pass on their genes, and raise children predisposed to such dishonesty - while, at the same time, still pre-disposed to strong in-group preference.
What we are seeing today is this group’s proclivities made manifest and run rampant. It is why, I believe, the only peaceful solution is separation - an uprooting, to use dear old Uncle’s words. Among themselves, the slimy shysters and the dishonest scammers will have no advantage, and indeed will be at a disadvantage - they can only scam their own in-group, and that’s more liable to be caught and discouraged. Their genetic proclivities can be repaired, so they no longer seek to behave parasitically as a cultural strategy.
