TAG DISCUSSION

So I made this tag for these images. that bed with petals ych
Not really sure that is the best name, but it was best I could come up with.

There is some inconsistency with the artist tags though.

most are tagged as artist:rioshi and artist:sparkling_light and artist:starshade

>>2389453 is tagged as artist:sharly and artist:sparkling_light

>>2736389 is tagged as artist:kim0508

Are some of those the same? Or should some of those be changed?

Is there a difference? Should one imply the other?

Some of G3 and G4 toys have a heart on their foreleg, and some arts include it.

Is there a tag for that, distinct from the hoof heart on bottom of hoof?

There’s also marking, which is aliased to markings over on DB.

I suspect marking/markings was at some point used for body paints, non-standard coat markings and whatnot, but got misused for normal coat markings enough that it’s now practically just an alternate tag for those.


@Fleur de Lis

I think hoof heart was that, originally, but got morphed into another variant of heart underhoof over time, similar to the above.

It’s now the main tag for heart underhooves on DB, and heart hoof, heart hooves & heart underhoof are aliased to it…

shibari -> bondage, rope bondage, rope

graveyard = cemetery

These are the same:
my little pony classics reimagined: little fillies
little fillies

And should that imply little women, since comic is based on that novel?

@Fleur de Lis
Yeah, there should be an implication there. I’ll go ahead and add it.

@Fleur de Lis
In all likelihood, no. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a use, even if people don’t always use it in the way it’s meant to be done.

@Fleur de Lis
Merged into machine learning abomination. And no, I don’t think that counts as a species, however funny that would be.

@Exhumed Legume
Done.

@Fleur de Lis
…I have no idea. The more I look into those artist tags the more they confuse me. No proper sources from what I can see, no aliases, and a number seem to have been associated with or edited into seemingly unrelated artist tags. Very confusing.

@Fleur de Lis
I honestly see no difference? Just gonna merge it.

@Exhumed Legume
Done.

@Fleur de Lis
Did the first part, but I’ll hold off on the implication for now.

loving sex -> sex

filly misty brightdawn -> foal

pussy peek -> vulva _{^{This poor, misused and abused tag… I’ll have to crawl through all of it some day and remove it where it doesn’t belong}}

More G3 ponies:

Abra-ca-dabra
Autumn Skye
Butterscotch
Star Swirl

artist:corruptedluna = artist:magnaluna

ETA: Also, artist:magnalunansfw

@Exhumed Legume
Done.

@Fleur de Lis
Done.

@Exhumed Legume
And done.

Should winter outfit imply clothes?

artist:scarlett-sketches, artist:sc4rletspectrum = artist:scarlet-spectrum

artist:user001 = artist:theuser

artist:tyutya_loh123 = artist:tyutya

@Fleur de Lis
Yes, yes it should.

@Exhumed Legume
Dealt with.

I’ve been thinking about the rating on this post and the only reason it’s tagged as “suggestive” is because there’s one part in the video that has Rainbow Dash shaking her butt. But I really don’t think it’s that bad and it’s only there for a second. So I think this video should be tagged as safe.

artist:lolicoom = artist:serasugee



vulvar winking -> pony pussy, nudity

big balls -> balls, nudity

impossibly large balls -> huge balls, big balls, balls, nudity

hyper balls -> impossibly large balls, huge balls, big balls, balls, nudity



Missing nudity implication:

splitting spear

Okay I clicked on the YouTube link in the source of this video and it’s been claimed by YouTube Kids and I think if YouTube Kids says it’s appropriate enough for kids then I think it would be fine to change the rating of this post to safe.

YT also thinks straight-up groomer shit like Queer Kids Stuff is appropriate for children, your argument is invalid.

@Exhumed Legume
Yeah but the video I’m talking is e see still really not that inappropriate for kids. Plus it’s not always YouTube who makes videos available on YouTube Kids I’m pretty sure it’s usually whoever published the video that makes that decision and I honestly agree with them because again the only thing that is kind of suggestive in that video is there’s a clip of Rainbow Dash shaking her butt at the viewer. But it only appears for a second.

@Finn Mertens
The point is “it’s on YT Kids so it’s safe” isn’t a sound argument, because PB has stricter criteria.

@Finn Mertens
UPS posts worst take ever
asked to leave ponybooru.org

@Finn Mertens
It’s rated that way for some of the imagery that flashes in the background.

@Officer Hotpants
I watched it again and the part with Rainbow Dash I was thinking of wasn’t in there. And again, most of what is shown in the background is paced fast and it’s hard to really notice any of it.

@Officer Hotpants
Okay now I noticed some of the suggestive stuff in there when I changed the playback speed. But I also noticed some stuff that would fall into the grimdark category.

@Exhumed Legume
All done.