Derpibooru has not started mass importing from Ponybooru

@Azure Fang  

 
I know, and those bitching about “muh nazi” can fuck off since that content is filtered by default.  
I’m more worried about the drama queen kind of users which is a significant portion of people there. That people always kills the ambient.

@Anonymous #789D  
Who are you quoting?

@Тпсс_  
I have hope that ponybooru would deal with those kinds of users rather than leave them be because they’re active or “they do a lot of tags”

@Zaknel  
“Lack of evidence.”  
The mere fact no court will even agree to hear any of the evidence should terrify you.

@Anonymous #789D  
Depends if they are breaking any rules. If we started banning people because they’re annoying, we’d be stooping to derpi’s level  
But if you’re talking about people who do nothing but derail conversations… They’d be pointed the the forums

@Sapphie  
I’m referring to a former derpi mod’s comments on why he wasn’t allowed to ban TUA

@Anonymous #B24C  
>”Our desire is that more of the election process would be made transparent so there would be unquestionable confidence in our voting systems.”  
>”Submitted items may be edited or deleted to ensure quality of content.”  
>Only lists evidence pro-fraud  
>Primary sources: twitter, youtube, self  
>Does not denote thoroughly debunked claims  
>Parler
 
There’s a lot of “evidence” there, but not for what you’re pushing.

@Anonymous #789D  
TUA? I wasn’t as active on derpi as I am here, so I have no idea who that is

@Sapphie  
I assume they’re referring to TexasUberAlles. That’s the only infamous user with the initialism of TUA, I can think of.

@Anonymous #10E8  
Ah, I see. I used to follow him on tunglr back when that was a thing. Seemed like a normal person, given that he only posted poni

@Anonymous #10E8  
Yeah. Every time I saw him pop up he was trying to start shit or the post was already deleted for some rule or another. Pretty sure he was in the twittermite’s camp during the drama too.

@Sapphie  
He basically shits the forums non-stop and has a duck badge with description of, and I quote, “if report count was a score, he’d have the biggest score”.
 
He’s a pretty literal example of everything that is wrong with derpi staff.

@Anonymous #789D  
From what I’ve seen of him, he’s a rude, abrasive, and unpleasant individual. The perfect rabid attack dog they can let off the leash to do their dirty work.

TUA literally admitted publicly that he likes to troll people politically.

@Azure Fang  

 
Peak deboonkery.

@Anonymous #B24C  
Dude, forget trying to reason to tribal partisans. When you’re dealing with someone who says “Parler” as a point against, as if no one has ever uploaded anything true on Parler (I mean FFS, even Twitter has some truth uploaded to it, if you get to see it before the Trust and Safety Council yeets it) they’re already beyond any attempt at reasonable conversation.
 
In more bleak news, they’re already making a sweep for any establishment-alternative or ideologically non-conforming sites. Took a swing at KiwiFarms’ domain earlier I heard. I’m absolutely expecting an attempt to take down our “NaziBrony” Booru very soon…

@FeatherTrap  
I look forward to watching with popcorn as people who’ve supported SJWs and Biden change their tune once they inevitably come under fire.
 
Remember kids, if you support censoring, ruining lives, or even outright murdering people for arbitrary reasons, these arbitrary reasons can be applied to you just as easily.

@Blossomforth  
Joey?

@Barhandar  
Well you’ll be watching from gulag, because they’re gonna come for us first.
 
They’ll still keep their useful idiots around as long as they can be directed at ideological opposition. We’ll all be far too dead to enjoy popcorn by the time their usefulness is exhausted.

@Anonymous #A760  
No, that’s not Joey.

@Anonymous #A760  
Easy mistake, but no not him

@FeatherTrap  
I’m assuming that’s targeted at me, considering the Parler reference. The point of the connection is that Parler has been caught censoring liberal speech (or anything that doesn’t echo established conservative narratives, for that matter), making it no better than twitter on the other end of the spectrum. As to being a “partisan tribal”, nice strawman; that couldn’t be further from the truth. I’d say let’s take this to a proper thread, but with ad hominem attacks being thrown from the outset I can already tell that debate would go nowhere fast.
 
@Anonymous #B24C  
Parler is not the host. Parler is the social network the site is organizing from, already known to be extremely slanted toward one end off the political spectrum. “Casually dismissing” is accurate, because it’s easy to dismiss what’s already been skewed to fit a specific narrative. And those affidavits, as has been pointed out many times, must be corroborated to have merit, otherwise said merit comes from the person behind each affidavit or their knowledge of the claims made, and a significant count have failed one or both legal tests.
 
Now, if you have an unedited evidence source with legal backing, I’d love to see it. But in a more appropriate thread as my own responses have gone beyond the scope of this shitposting thread.

@Officer Hotpants  
Or variations of 4chan’s logo.

@Azure Fang  
I fully await you to put any kind of merit behind your words by actually PMing me. Don’t worry, I have a pretty clean schedule today, some cooking aside. I’ll wait.
 
Better get used to Parler, since Twitter going’s wild on a banning spree right now. At the current rate it’s going to be the only place where you even can spout of a right of centre-hell at this point anything right of Stalin-on the internet.
 
“with legal backing”  

“I see no problem with this!” :D  
Very persuasive. Much real. Definitely nothing to hide. Wow. Old meme