Regarding HXs DNP: I changed his DNP because I had just finished the mass delete of his art, and found the text beyond just offensive into the realm of defamatory. I’m under no obligation to syndicate my own defamation. The omission of the negatory was simply a mistake because I was very tired. It’s been corrected and his DNP now expresses both his wishes and his view. If he wants to keep preaching on a soapbox, he has Twitter. He has my apologies that it took me a while to tend the mass delete, and that’s all I can do.
Okay, that makes sense. I am aware of his nature.
Regarding the initial site rules, other than wanting “use your filters” to be rule 0, I had nothing to do with them. I need to not have to worry about site content issues at all so I can get back to working on the server this site should be living on and isn’t yet, and letting Z handle 100% of that was part of it. Once the cloud is solidified, I’ll turn my engineering concerns to the site and you’ll see rapid progress.
I don’t want to discredit any work that has been done on the site so far, especially when it comes to managing servers because that isn’t easy or cheap by any means; I’m just confused at some of the choices that has been made. Yes, it is important that the server and the site as a whole is functional, but I’d argue that the way the site’s rules and atmosphere is equally as important and shouldn’t be taken lightly, especially since this site is being presented as a Derpibooru alternative as mentioned before.
Unlike Furbooru (despite using the same framework), Derpibooru and Ponybooru serve similar purposes at face value; they’re both archives hosting MLP art, and they both are similar in terms of functionality and appearance. This means that people are going to notice differences between them much more, mainly the rules, how the staff acts and so forth. Combined with Ponybooru still being a relatively new site, first impressions are very important. I can only speak for myself here, but this site hasn’t made a good first impression with me. Taking power away from artists with their own work was never going to go down well and even if you weren’t personally responsible for it, a member of staff who’s also working on the site with you was.
Dil/HX and the angry blue bird crew et al trying to crucify this site from the day it spawned has made me numb to caring about their viewpoints. My ultimate goal is doing what’s best for the community and respecting the artists wishes as best I can and the political bickering means nothing to me. So much word soup has been tossed my direction I can’t even be bothered to read it anymore.
I’ll agree with you here. Again, I can only speak for myself, but I would have never filed my DNP if the rules when the site first went public were against artists. If any of your art pieces were uploaded here (which is quite likely considering there are people using bots to just import images straight from Derpibooru en masse), and you didn’t want your art here, you were tough out of luck because your only options were to file for a DNP, where the best option was just delaying uploads, or to send a letter to the site’s PO box with your contact info,
including your home address. It is much easier for an artist to remove their work from Derpibooru, and if you’re worried that will affect Ponybooru’s ability to be an image archive, the majority of artists who want to remove their work completely are doing so for a very
specific reason and are not doing it on a whim.
I still want my Artist Upload only DNP to stand, but instead of deleting the three images of mine that have been uploaded so far, I just want the uploader credit to be transferred over to me. I know this isn’t the best place to ask but I’ve mentioned to you before that I’m perfectly happy to use this site and upload my stuff as long as PB continues to listen to artists. At the end of the day this is just another site people can discover my work on so unless I have a serious problem with a site or how my work is being presented, I don’t have much reason for wanting my work removed. However, at the time I submitted it, I did have a problem. I suppose my overall point is that this headache could have been prevented if there were better DNP systems in place and if the rules weren’t written in the way that they were at public launch.
@Anonymous #31EC
I’m not angry, all I did was present some additional context that was relevant to the topic of the thread and question why the old rules even were allowed to go through in the first place, and I now have my answer.