Accurate

@Anonymous #9C6D
You think I’m kidding?

Tell me then, why do three different “reputable news organisations” feel a sudden need to debunk something as outlandish and absurd as the idea of using aborted fetuses in food. All on their own, within a month of each other…
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-fetal-cell-lines-flavor-development-170259316154
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N32W1ZP/
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/02/21/fact-check-false-claim-aborted-fetus-tissue-food-drinks/11272128002/
You would think that such a thing would be so outlandish as be beneath the notice such people, no?
Seems odd for them all to go out of their way to disprove any such insane notion.
Is this what TV tropes call a Suspiciously Specific Denial?

@Anonymous #6D07
CURSED

@Anonymous #6D07  
Where will we get those sweet, delectable stem cells?

But… Without aborted fetuses, what will we snack on?

True