I have seen a few people whine about the voice+build thing because how dare you have your romanceable characters have sexual preferences?
Wanna bet that if they were all bi the alphabet soup’d whine about lack of gay representation? Also, the entitled shit about sexual preferences (or rather, trying to force people to have sex with alphabet soup) is going on IRL far too much.
I’ve been playing it a few hours a day on average for the past month or so, and I’ve definitely been seeing less and less bugs with every patch.
People are saying the last patch introduced more bugs, but in general, it’s pretty much entirely as expected after Witcher 3.
@Barhandar
I’ve been playing it a few hours a day on average for the past month or so, and I’ve definitely been seeing less and less bugs with every patch.
Charlie’s (Cr1tikal) review of it what got me to get it, though. I know he’s rather unbiased.
I have seen a few people whine about the voice+build thing because how dare you have your romanceable characters have sexual preferences?
@Sapphie
Good luck lol, Gamergate taught them absolutely nothing.
@ANoobis
Bug-ridden, but extremely well-detailed and with, depending on how you go about it, over a hundred hours of content in it. Also the “transphobic” ingame ad is mocking all the IRL rainbow-logoers while the character creation options is “give a meter, they’ll try to take the whole mile” whining about how devs didn’t waste several years detailing all the attack helicopters and made the game determine your romance options based on build+voice (genitalia customization is independent).
@ArchiveAnon
They weren’t so much reviewers that I watch as they were reviews that Flipboard decided I should see. They weren’t good for much more than identifying sources to mute.
@ANoobis
Not sure what reviewers you’re watching but I think you need to find new reviewers to watch.
From what I hear the game is decent in terms of story and the amount of shit to do, but it is filled with loads of bugs. As is typical of basically any new game release today. Wait a couple months, let the initial patches release, and pick it up then is what I keep getting told, and that’s exactly what I intend to do.
I’ve been having trouble getting any actual idea of how the game is. The few reviews I saw just wanted to get brownie points by accusing the developers of being transphobes instead of actually reviewing anything.
I’ve been playing it a few hours a day on average for the past month or so, and I’ve definitely been seeing less and less bugs with every patch.
Charlie’s (Cr1tikal) review of it what got me to get it, though. I know he’s rather unbiased.
I have seen a few people whine about the voice+build thing because how dare you have your romanceable characters have sexual preferences?
Good luck lol, Gamergate taught them absolutely nothing.
@ANoobis
Bug-ridden, but extremely well-detailed and with, depending on how you go about it, over a hundred hours of content in it. Also the “transphobic” ingame ad is mocking all the IRL rainbow-logoers while the character creation options is “give a meter, they’ll try to take the whole mile” whining about how devs didn’t waste several years detailing all the attack helicopters and made the game determine your romance options based on build+voice (genitalia customization is independent).
Edited
I mean, you shouldn’t trust video game journalists anyway. Unless you find an example of a relatively unbiased reviewer
Edited because: Curse of typos is spreadinng
They weren’t so much reviewers that I watch as they were reviews that Flipboard decided I should see. They weren’t good for much more than identifying sources to mute.
Not sure what reviewers you’re watching but I think you need to find new reviewers to watch.
From what I hear the game is decent in terms of story and the amount of shit to do, but it is filled with loads of bugs. As is typical of basically any new game release today. Wait a couple months, let the initial patches release, and pick it up then is what I keep getting told, and that’s exactly what I intend to do.