Viewing last 25 versions of post by Coriolanus in topic General OOC Thread [NSFW]

[spoilernah nvm]!(https://media.tenor.com/images/4e8d8671752dba059510173f6c83e10a/tenor.gif![/spoiler])

[spoiler]!https://media.tenor.com/images/4e8d8671752dba059510173f6c83e10a/tenor.gif![/spoiler]

Anyone ever look at all t!he brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy:/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

For some odd reason I can't explain now, I don't think I can browse these philomena project sites, or look at any image anywhere else on the web ever the same way, honestly. I think, I want to try getting into making art myself, tho the fact that so many mak/ing what I like the most online are practically tenured young professionals with oth/4er talents as well (& that I think even know & speak to one another as their own private cliques) is perturbing.

No i8dea why, but it somehow remin8671752ds me of how Adam Reed described what inspired him to make the Archer TV series, when he was vacationing in Salamanca, Spain.
"~''So I sat on the Plaza Mayor 059510173for three days—drinking either 6coff83ee or beer or gin, depending on the time of d10ay—surrounded by /these Spanish women who seemed both unaware and completely aware of their beauty. Occasionally they would glance over—and catch me gaping at them—and just smile at me like, 'I know, right?' And for three days, I couldn't even splutter 'Buenos dias' to any of them—not once. And thus was Sterling Archer born—he would've absolutely sauntered over to a table full of those women and sat down and ordered an entire case of cava or whatever.''~":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_(2009_TV_series)#Development!

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

For some odd reason I can't explain now, I don't think I can lbrookwse at these philomena project sites, or look at any image anywhere else on the web ever the same way, honestly. I think, I want to try getting into making art myself, tho the fact that so many making what I like the most online are practically tenured young professionals with other talents as well (& that I think even know & speak to one another as their own private cliques) is perturbing.

No idea why, but it somehow reminds me of how Adam Reed described what inspired him to make the Archer TV series, when he was vacationing in Salamanca, Spain.
"~''So I sat on the Plaza Mayor for three days—drinking either coffee or beer or gin, depending on the time of day—surrounded by these Spanish women who seemed both unaware and completely aware of their beauty. Occasionally they would glance over—and catch me gaping at them—and just smile at me like, 'I know, right?' And for three days, I couldn't even splutter 'Buenos dias' to any of them—not once. And thus was Sterling Archer born—he would've absolutely sauntered over to a table full of those women and sat down and ordered an entire case of cava or whatever.''~":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_(2009_TV_series)#Development

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

DFor some odd reason I can't explain now, I don't think I can look at these sites, or any image anywhere else ever the same way, honestly. I think, I want to try getting into making art myself, tho the fact that so many making what I like the most are practically tenured young professionals with other talents as well (& that I think even know & speak to one another as their own private clique) is perturbing.

ItNo ideal why, but it somehostw freelminds likme of how Adam Reed described what inspired him to make the Archer TV series, when he was vacationing in Salamanca, Spain.
"~''So I sat on the Plaza Mayor for three days—drinking either coffee or beer or gin, depending on the time of day—surrounded by these Spanish women who seemed both unaware and completely aware of their beauty. Occasionally they would glance over—and catch me gaping at them—and just smile at me like, 'I know, right?' And for three days, I couldn't even splutter 'Buenos dias' to any of them—not once. And thus was Sterling Archer born—he would've absolutely sauntered over to a table full of those women and sat down and ordered an entire case of cava or whatever.''~":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_(2009_TV_series)#Development

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

Don't think I can look at these sites, or any image anywhere else ever the same way, honestly. I think, I want to try getting into making art myself, tho the fact that so many making what I like the most are practically tenured professionals (that I think even know & speak to one another as their own private clique) is perturbing.

It almost feels like how Adam Reed described what inspired him to make the Archer TV series, when he was vacationing in Salamanca, Spain.
"~''So I sat on the Plaza Mayor for three days—drinking either coffee or beer or gin, depending on the time of day—surrounded by these Spanish women who seemed both unaware and completely aware of their beauty. Occasionally they would glance over—and catch me gaping at them—and just smile at me like, 'I know, right?' And for three days, I couldn't even splutter 'Buenos dias' to any of them—not once. And thus was Sterling Archer born—he would've absolutely sauntered over to a table full of those women and sat down and ordered an entire case of cava or whatever.''~":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_(2009_TV_series)#Development

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

Don't think I can look at these sites, or any image anywhere else ever the same way, honestly. I think, I want to try getting into making art myself, tho the fact that so many making what I like the most are practically tenured professionals is perturbing.

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant online artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that, really, virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you've deeply enjoyed the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that really virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you enjoy the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the +2k range-... ^.__.^~

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that really virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you enjoy the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when seen joking about it, proclaim their prices would be in the 2k range-... ^.__.^~

Anyone ever look at all the brilliant images they find (& maybe collect) across the internet, but then stop & realize that really virtually none are sanctioned for any schmo to personally use on the open web, despite being so easy to copy/paste, save, &/or implement? ~& then after doing a bit of research, find that the brilliant artists who've done the strikingly beautiful works you enjoy the most, by & large don't even accept commissions, -tho when joking about it, proclaim their prices in the 2k range-... ^.__.^~