FeatherTrap 
Public Relations
Sir Boops-A-Lot
[@Anonymous \#397F](/forums/meta/topics/ponybooru-collab-image-2024-edition?post_id=100055#post_100055)
[@UrbanMysticDee](/forums/meta/topics/ponybooru-collab-image-2024-edition?post_id=100050#post_100050)
Nothing is solid on that matter just yet, this is why I made a **proposition** instead of a **demand**, I suspected there might be reasonable objections to the suggestion.
The intent of the rule is to keep the number of individual entries from becoming overwhelming to the point where we can't fit everything into the scene, not to prevent group entries.
**How about this amendment:**
> If someone wishes to submit multiple of their own OCs in a single entry they can do so, as long as it balances out with the entry count.
>
> Let me provide an example: Instead of listing individual entries as #1, #2 and #3, if someone wants to submit an entry with their pony and their sibling together and then another individual entry, they would be listed as #1 (siblings group entry) and #2 (individual) with no third entry.
>
> If someone wants to submit one entry with three (or more) of their own OCs (let's say an entry with their OC, their two siblings and their parents, five in total) that would be allowed on condition that it's the only entry they make, with no additional individual entries.
>
I think that sounds like a fair and reasonable compromise that addresses these complaints, does anyone disagree?
[@UrbanMysticDee](/forums/meta/topics/ponybooru-collab-image-2024-edition?post_id=100050#post_100050)
Nothing is solid on that matter just yet, this is why I made a **proposition** instead of a **demand**, I suspected there might be reasonable objections to the suggestion.
The intent of the rule is to keep the number of individual entries from becoming overwhelming to the point where we can't fit everything into the scene, not to prevent group entries.
**How about this amendment:**
> If someone wishes to submit multiple of their own OCs in a single entry they can do so, as long as it balances out with the entry count.
>
> Let me provide an example: Instead of listing individual entries as #1, #2 and #3, if someone wants to submit an entry with their pony and their sibling together and then another individual entry, they would be listed as #1 (siblings group entry) and #2 (individual) with no third entry.
>
> If someone wants to submit one entry with three (or more) of their own OCs (let's say an entry with their OC, their two siblings and their parents, five in total) that would be allowed on condition that it's the only entry they make, with no additional individual entries.
>
I think that sounds like a fair and reasonable compromise that addresses these complaints, does anyone disagree?