Viewing last 25 versions of post by Barhandar in topic Big Bad Politics!

Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

"[@Etherium-Apex":](/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=57987#post_57987
)  
>strawman about opponents getting called nazis
 
>strawman about sympathizing with marxists
 
>"I defeated those strawmen" pat on the back
 
>general historical ignorance
 
>"uh sweetie soviets put people into camps for 50+ years"
 
>"uh sweetie SA/brownshirts didn't assault political opponents and pogrom shit, the nazi equivalent of the bible/das kapital says so"
 
>"uh sweetie NSDAP totally wasn't planning a violent takeover and got _*really_* surprised when they got honestly elected"
 
>"uh sweetie marxists took power by murdering Romanovs and assuming power"


 
dude lmao we're not a marxist forum (except for certain users) and _*you_* need to brush up on history
 
Especially the "Russian civil war" part, especially the parts where
 
1: **bolsheviks are called such because they _*got the majority by popular support_* in the last assembly that actually mattered*
*  
2: how by that assembly, much less their execution, the Romanovs weren't rulers anymore (they were forced to GTFO in favor of Temporary Government, which was spineless and ruled for less than a year and also got forced to GTFO, then people in control were switching constantly until the aforementioned assembly),
 
3: how the civil war was essentially Reds-socialists (bolsheviks, who, by the way, went for "all you get without letting people have independent nations is a civil war in there" and got immediately proven right by the Finns) vs Whites-socialists (mensheviks, democrats, liberals, basically the typical self-eating left), with the latter also having imperialists (army of russian empire) and nationalists (mostly because they hated commies, despite the independence)
 
4: how instead of "lol they just assumed power" they actually had to fight for it, both externally (e.g. czechoslovaks who learnt of Trotsky's plan to disarm them and execute anyone armed on the spot and did what US-ians refuse to do, that is, started shooting the commies the fuck up) and internally (again, left is self-eating)
 
5: how both sides did a fuckload of pillaging, raping and burning (but the Whites more owing to controlling, at first, more territory and having less of a leash on it)
 
6: the shenanigans with English invasion in the north, full course deal with concentration camps, chemical weapons
 
7: the shenanigans with Japanese invasion in the east
 
8: some individuals like Pepelyaev who commanded the White armies, was so ballsy that the reds _*convicted and imprisoned him_* instead of shooting him on the spot, successfully lived through that, and only got executed by Stalin's NKVD in 1938
 
9: (Stalin is as much of a commie as Mao, Pol Pot, Kims, etc: they're all totalitarian dictators using communism as window dressing; ditto Hitler, though he _*did_* fulfill more promises, but he also had, as you pointed out, an actually more or less prosperous country instead of needing to bring a bunch of post-war peasants to world-war-winning levels and succeeding)
 
10: the whole deal with monolithic (because the self-eaters either flipped sides or were persuaded otherwise/executed) Bolsheviks/Reds and a bunch of completely separate, foreigner-funded idiots the Whites
 
11: Reds continued the _*Monarchist_*, made in 1916, policy of food supply (all goes to the army, you join or you starve), Whites had all the fertile land and hence _*civilians refusing to join up_* in their fight



 
 
tl;dr: the only one here calling marxists nazis is you, I'm calling them same shit because they ARE same authoritarian shit, and you don't know history
 
P.S. No, that they technically weren't commies doesn't excuse Stalin & Co, because they're the _*inevitable result_* of commies coming to power, communism is too vulnerable to takeover, and consequently they can be considered commies.  
P.P.S. Night of Long Knives as the equivalent to Stalin's ChK/NKVD purges, and after the nazis were supposedly defeated, the "suicided in decidedly non-suicide ways" RAF leaders - Germans might be pretending to be guilty, but they ain't rejecting the methods.
No reason given
Edited by Barhandar
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

"@Etherium-Apex":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=57987#post_57987
>strawman about opponents getting called nazis
>strawman about sympathizing with marxists
>"I defeated those strawmen" pat on the back
>general historical ignorance
>"uh sweetie soviets put people into camps for 50+ years"
>"uh sweetie SA/brownshirts didn't assault political opponents and pogrom shit, the nazi equivalent of the bible/das kapital says so"
>"uh sweetie NSDAP totally wasn't planning a violent takeover and got _really_ surprised when they got honestly elected"
>"uh sweetie marxists took power by murdering Romanovs and assuming power"

dude lmao we're not a marxist forum (except for certain users) and _you_ need to brush up on history
Especially the "Russian civil war" part, especially the parts where
1: *bolsheviks are called such because they _got the majority by popular support_ in the last assembly that actually mattered*
2: how by that assembly, much less their execution, the Romanovs weren't rulers anymore (they were forced to GTFO in favor of Temporary Government, which was spineless and ruled for less than a year and also got forced to GTFO, then people in control were switching constantly until the aforementioned assembly),
3: how the civil war was essentially Reds-socialists (bolsheviks, who, by the way, went for "all you get without letting people have independent nations is a civil war in there" and got immediately proven right by the Finns) vs Whites-socialists (mensheviks, democrats, liberals, basically the typical self-eating left), with the latter also having imperialists (army of russian empire) and nationalists (mostly because they hated commies, despite the independence)
4: how instead of "lol they just assumed power" they actually had to fight for it, both externally (e.g. czechoslovaks who learnt of Trotsky's plan to disarm them and execute anyone armed on the spot and did what US-ians refuse to do, that is, started shooting the commies the fuck up) and internally (again, left is self-eating)
5: how both sides did a fuckload of pillaging, raping and burning (but the Whites more owing to controlling, at first, more territory and having less of a leash on it)
6: the shenanigans with English invasion in the north, full course deal with concentration camps, chemical weapons
7: the shenanigans with Japanese invasion in the east
8: some individuals like Pepelyaev who commanded the White armies, was so ballsy that the reds _convicted and imprisoned him_ instead of shooting him on the spot, successfully lived through that, and only got executed by Stalin's NKVD in 1938
9: (Stalin is as much of a commie as Mao, Pol Pot, Kims, etc: they're all totalitarian dictators using communism as window dressing; ditto Hitler, though he _did_ fulfill more promises, but he also had, as you pointed out, an actually more or less prosperous country instead of needing to bring a bunch of post-war peasants to world-war-winning levels and succeeding)
10: the whole deal with monolithic (because the self-eaters either flipped sides or were persuaded otherwise/executed) Bolsheviks/Reds and a bunch of completely separate, foreigner-funded idiots the Whites
11: Reds continued the _Monarchist_, made in 1916, policy of food supply (all goes to the army, you join or you starve), Whites had all the fertile land and hence _civilians refusing to join up_ in their fight


tl;dr: the only one here calling marxists nazis is you, I'm calling them same shit because they ARE same authoritarian shit, and you don't know history
P.S. No, that they technically weren't commies doesn't excuse Stalin & Co, because they're the _inevitable result_ of commies coming to power, communism is too vulnerable to takeover, and consequently they can be considered commies.
No reason given
Edited by Barhandar
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

"@Etherium-Apex":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=57987#post_57987
>strawman about opponents getting called nazis
>strawman about sympathizing with marxists
>"I defeated those strawmen" pat on the back
>general historical ignorance
>"uh sweetie soviets put people into camps for 50+ years"
>"uh sweetie SA/brownshirts didn't assault political opponents and pogrom shit, the nazi equivalent of the bible/das kapital says so"
>"uh sweetie NSDAP totally wasn't planning a violent takeover and got _really_ surprised when they got honestly elected"
>"uh sweetie marxists took power by murdering Romanovs and assuming power"

dude lmao we're not a marxist forum (except for certain users) and _you_ need to brush up on history
Especially the "Russian civil war" part, especially the parts where
1: *bolsheviks are called such because they _got the majority by popular support_ in the last assembly that actually mattered*
2: how by that assembly, much less their execution, the Romanovs weren't rulers anymore (they were forced to GTFO in favor of Temporary Government, which was spineless and ruled for less than a year and also got forced to GTFO, then people in control were switching constantly until the aforementioned assembly),
3: how the civil war was essentially Reds-socialists (bolsheviks, who, by the way, went for "all you get without letting people have independent nations is a civil war in there" and got immediately proven right by the Finns) vs Whites-socialists (mensheviks, democrats, liberals, basically the typical self-eating left), with the latter also having imperialists (army of russian empire) and nationalists (mostly because they hated commies, despite the independence)
4: how instead of "lol they just assumed power" they actually had to fight for it, both externally (e.g. czechoslovaks who learnt of Trotsky's plan to disarm them and execute anyone armed on the spot and did what US-ians refuse to do, that is, started shooting the commies the fuck up) and internally (again, left is self-eating)
5: how both sides did a fuckload of pillaging, raping and burning (but the Whites more owing to controlling, at first, more territory and having less of a leash on it)
6: the shenanigans with English invasion in the north, full course deal with concentration camps, chemical weapons
7: the shenanigans with Japanese invasion in the east
8: some individuals like Pepelyaev who commanded the White armies, was so ballsy that the reds _convicted and imprisoned him_ instead of shooting him on the spot, successfully lived through that, and only got executed by Stalin's NKVD in 1938
9: (Stalin is as much of a commie as Mao, Pol Pot, Kims, etc: they're all totalitarian dictators using communism as window dressing; ditto Hitler, though he _did_ fulfill more promises, but he also had, as you pointed out, an actually more or less prosperous country instead of needing to bring a bunch of post-war peasants to world-war-winning levels and succeeding)
10: the whole deal with monolithic (because the self-eaters either flipped sides or were persuaded otherwise/executed) Bolsheviks/Reds and a bunch of completely separate, foreigner-funded idiots the Whites
11: Reds continued the _Monarchist_, made in 1916, policy of food supply (all goes to the army, you join or you starve), Whites had all the fertile land and hence _civilians refusing to join up_ in their fight


tl;dr: the only one here calling marxists nazis is you, I'm calling them same shit because they ARE same authoritarian shit, and you don't know history
No reason given
Edited by Barhandar
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

"@Etherium-Apex":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=57987#post_57987
>strawman about opponents getting called nazis
>strawman about sympathizing with marxists
>"I defeated those strawmen" pat on the back
>general historical ignorance
>"uh sweetie soviets put people into camps for 50+ years"
>"uh sweetie SA/brownshirts didn't assault political opponents and pogrom shit, the nazi equivalent of the bible/das kapital says so"
>"uh sweetie NSDAP totally wasn't planning a violent takeover and got _really_ surprised when they got honestly elected"
>"uh sweetie marxists took power by murdering Romanovs and assuming power"

dude lmao we're not a marxist forum (except for certain users) and _you_ need to brush up on history
Especially the "Russian civil war" part, especially the parts where
1: *bolsheviks are called such because they _got the majority by popular support_ in the last assembly that actually mattered*
2: how by that assembly, much less their execution, the Romanovs weren't rulers anymore (they were forced to GTFO in favor of Temporary Government, which was spineless and ruled for less than a year and also got forced to GTFO, then people in control were switching constantly until the aforementioned assembly),
3: how the civil war was essentially Reds-socialists (bolsheviks, who, by the way, went for "all you get without letting people have independent nations is a civil war in there" and got immediately proven right by the Finns) vs Whites-socialists (mensheviks, democrats, liberals, basically the typical self-eating left), with the latter also having imperialists (army of russian empire) and nationalists (mostly because they hated commies, despite the independence)
4: how instead of "lol they just assumed power" they actually had to fight for it, both externally (e.g. czechoslovaks who learnt of Trotsky's plan to disarm them and execute anyone armed on the spot and did what US-ians refuse to do, that is, started shooting the commies the fuck up) and internally (again, left is self-eating)
5: how both sides did a fuckload of pillaging, raping and burning (but the Whites more owing to controlling, at first, more territory and having less of a leash on it)
6: the shenanigans with English invasion in the north, full course deal with concentration camps, chemical weapons
7: the shenanigans with Japanese invasion in the east
8: some individuals like Pepelyaev who commanded the White armies, was so ballsy that the reds _convicted and imprisoned him_ instead of shooting him on the spot, successfully lived through that, and only got executed by Stalin's NKVD in 1938
9: (Stalin is as much of a commie as Mao, Pol Pot, Kims, etc: they're all totalitarian dictators using communism as window dressing; ditto Hitler, though he _did_ fulfill more promises, but he also had, as you pointed out, an actually more or less prosperous country instead of needing to bring a bunch of post-war peasants to world-war-winning levels and succeeding)
10: the whole deal with monolithic Bolsheviks/Reds and a bunch of completely separate, foreigner-funded idiots the Whites
11: Reds continued the _Monarchist_, made in 1916, policy of food supply (all goes to the army, you join or you starve), Whites had all the fertile land and hence _civilians refusing to join up_ in their fight


tl;dr: the only one here calling marxists nazis is you, I'm calling them same shit because they ARE same authoritarian shit, and you don't know history
No reason given
Edited by Barhandar
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

"@Etherium-Apex":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=57987#post_57987
>strawman about opponents getting called nazis
>strawman about sympathizing with marxists
>"I defeated those strawmen" pat on the back
>general historical ignorance
>"uh sweetie soviets put people into camps for 50+ years"
>"uh sweetie SA/brownshirts didn't assault political opponents and pogrom shit, the nazi equivalent of the bible/das kapital says so"
>"uh sweetie NSDAP totally wasn't planning a violent takeover and got _really_ surprised when they got honestly elected"
>"uh sweetie marxists took power by murdering Romanovs and assuming power"
dude lmao we're not a marxist forum (except for certain users) and _you_ need to brush up on history
Especially the "Russian civil war" part, especially the parts where
1: *bolsheviks are called such because they _got the majority by popular support_ in the last assembly that actually mattered*
2: how by that assembly, much less their execution, the Romanovs weren't rulers anymore (they were forced to GTFO in favor of Temporary Government, which was spineless and ruled for less than a year and also got forced to GTFO, then people in control were switching constantly until the aforementioned assembly),
3: how the civil war was essentially Reds-socialists (bolsheviks, who, by the way, went for "all you get without letting people have independent nations is a civil war in there" and got immediately proven right by the Finns) vs Whites-socialists (mensheviks, democrats, liberals, basically the typical self-eating left), with the latter also having imperialists (army of russian empire) and nationalists (mostly because they hated commies, despite the independence)
4: how instead of "lol they just assumed power" they actually had to fight for it, both externally (e.g. czechoslovaks who learnt of Trotsky's plan to disarm them and execute anyone armed on the spot and did what US-ians refuse to do, that is, started shooting the commies the fuck up) and internally (again, left is self-eating)
5: how both sides did a fuckload of pillaging, raping and burning (but the Whites more owing to controlling, at first, more territory and having less of a leash on it)
6: the shenanigans with English invasion in the north, full course deal with concentration camps, chemical weapons
7: the shenanigans with Japanese invasion in the east
8: some individuals like Pepelyaev who commanded the White armies, was so ballsy that the reds _convicted and imprisoned him_ instead of shooting him on the spot, successfully lived through that, and only got executed by Stalin's NKVD in 1938
9: (Stalin is as much of a commie as Mao, Pol Pot, Kims, etc: they're all totalitarian dictators using communism as window dressing)
10: the whole deal with monolithic Bolsheviks/Reds and a bunch of completely separate, foreigner-funded idiots the Whites
11: Reds continued the _Monarchist_, made in 1916, policy of food supply (all goes to the army, you join or you starve), Whites had all the fertile land and hence _civilians refusing to join up_ in their fight


tl;dr: the only one here calling marxists nazis is you, I'm calling them same shit because they ARE same authoritarian shit, and you don't know history
No reason given
Edited by Barhandar