Mod Audit Log

Report:
Comment on >>25347
Reason:
Other: Personal insult.
Rule #11: This retard has been following me around for ages. Back when I was on Derpi he’d pull this same shit all the time. He’d get suspended for 2 days, come back, do it again, and it would repeat and and over, with at most, a 2 day suspension. Someone please shut this slandering dipshit up for good.
Action taken:
Comment deleted; user banned for 3 days. Repeated infractions will result in longer, more permanent bans.
Original Text:
||

Doesn’t change the fact you stole from JB Pony.

||

Report:
Comment on >>25347
Reason:
Other: Personal insult.
Action taken:
Comment deleted; user banned for 3 days. Repeated infractions will result in longer, more permanent bans.
Original Text:
||

Fact is you’re also supporting pedophilia.

||

Report:
Comment on >>3202729 (merged)
Reason:
Rule #11: Linking me to a spikeabuse post just to troll me.
Action taken:
Comments locked - user has been told to stop responding to obvious bait.

Report:
Comment on >>3202729 (merged)
Reason:
Rule #11: And the spikeabuser himself isn’t making it any better either. I am seriously getting sick of seeing these spikeabuse trolls just coming to these edited images of Spike and won’t just leave me alone. Please can someone just do something about it. I have asked them on multiple occasions to leave my spikelove images alone multiple times and they’re never going to listen to me.
Action taken:
See above.

Report:
Comment on >>3050483
Reason:
Rule #5: Can I please have some help here. They they’re stirring up some drama that was 8 months ago.
Action taken:
See above.

Report:
Comment on >>3209617
Reasons:
Rule #6: I’m not sure but this looks like it might be a problem. I might be trigger-happy.
Other: The naked child in the picture might get us in trouble.
Rule #6: I think that even blurred the pic on that comment might be a problem.
Action taken:
Comment removed with extreme prejudice.
Original Text:

@Deserter
<image redacted>
You! LOL!

Image:
>>1221423
Report:
Other: Description should link to “>>2521507t” instead
Action Taken:
Description fixed.

User:
<user redacted for privacy>
Reason:
Other: Hi, I’d like to change all the artist link to hidden status. Thanks.

(Not active as artist currently)
Action taken:
Artist link privated.

Report:
Post in the Big Bad Politics! thread
Reason:
Rule #0: Pretty sure threatening to kill someone goes beyond normal edginess.
Action taken:
Post deleted - Less threatening, and more… off-topic schizophrenic rambling.
Original Text:
||

Armed Forces of Ukraine will find you and kill you, for truth cannot be shot, for Azov and Bucha, for Chernigiv , for Irpen, and for Bucha, for Hershon, for Harkiv, for Odessa, for Zitomir, for Poltava, for Mikolaev, for Kriviy Rig, for Bogdan Khmelntsky,for Vinnitsa, for Krim, for Kupyansk, for Izum, for Balakliya, for famine, for communism, for you are the orc who hides from the truth like orcs hide from the sun. And your relatives will be killed.

||

Report:
Comment on >>3185204
Reason:
Rule #8
Action taken:
Dismissed - Anon is ESL, not over-rating.

Image:
>>3200644
Report:
Rule #11: Some troll name-calling and insulting people.
Action Taken:
Dismissed - As much as I’d like to delete, we’ve opted to keep similar images. As such, it will be kept for the time being.

Image:
>>3094515
Report:
Takedown request: need deletion to make new account
Action Taken:
Dismissed - please create a verified artist link and file a DNP, just like everyone else.

Image:
>>3079723
Report:
Takedown request: need deletion to make new account
Action Taken:
See above.

Image:
>>3067596
Report:
Takedown request: need deletion to make new account
Action Taken:
See above.

Report:
Post in the Derpibooru PTSD Relief Thread thread
Reason:
Rule #0: #C581 is using different words but he’s still asking us to go and raid Derpibooru.
Action taken:
Reported post, as well as the two previous posts from the same user, deleted. User banned for 24h.
Original Texts:
||

Eh, figures.

I’ll just utilize the PMs or Discord instead, then.

I still see some possible hope in such a thing happening, though—if you gain a foothold in that thread and keep it, the chances of the dominant atmosphere of that site being forever unchallenged vanish, depending on how long until Ciaran or possibly Smiling bring down the banhammer.

I know so personally, from experience.

And Ciaran is the only one with any immediate banning or deletion power deliberately blocking that path.

(Note: I’m not calling to arms, here. I’ll be looking into that shit off-site, from now on.)

@Anonymous #5F71
None as a personal army, no, but only as a mutually interested cooperative group effort with only other users who have any sort of similar personal interest (if there are any who do).

Sort of like a 4chan operation, but only for a genuinely decent cause.

That aside, I mean, why only sit around and grumble about the situation when you can take direct dissenting action against it like I have, for the past two years?

It really does work, because if you manage to successfully have your own posts on there posted on there, daily or generally frequently—and end up succeeding in having them left untouched by the mods on there, a while after you posted it— you’ve permanently made your mark in that thread, and because that post of yours takes up whole space on that page that would’ve otherwise gone to a different user with a wildly different political stance or agenda, you’ve effectively reduced the amount of space on that page that they could take up, while expanding your own.

Trust me, provided that you’re able to construct it in a way where it can never possibly be banned, it really works. And again, I know so from personal experience.

@FeatherTrap
That may be largely true, yet consider this:

Any frequent and routine sign of dissent in one thread is still objectively better than none in any thread, because when considering that the main gripes we have with Derpibooru on here are entirely political by chance, given that the politics thread is the only place that can ever be discussed, if the majority (at minimum) of any posts from any of us in that thread manage to remain undeleted, and if such posts that ultimately remain that way continue to be frequently published, then it will leave a significant impression on any viewer that such dissent on that website IS tolerated.

The tricky part is to construct your dissent in a way that does not butcher the clarity and honesty of your stance, whilst still being absolutely impossible for any of the mods (yes, even Ciaran) to delete it.

I’ve been doing that on there for 2 years, and there is a way.

||

Report:
Comment on >>3180523
Reason:
Rule #11: Usage of the T slur.
Action taken:
Dismissed - Offence is ultimately taken, not given. “Tranny” is also a pretty weak slur in the grand scheme of things.

User:
Officer Hotpants
Reason:
Other: Can we just post in the audit log that he got promoted, please?
Action taken:
Let it be hereby recorded in the Grand Moderation Ledger that the user known as Officer Hotpants has been bestowed the almighty status of Moderator by the divine Administrators Acres and ZizzyDizzyMC, and shall herein be required to fulfil all duties thereof.

Image:
>>3211389 (deleted)
Report:
Takedown request: Someone sent me a high quality version of the screenshot.
Action Taken:
Dismissed - This is why the duplicate feature exists. Please use it.

Image:
>>3211389 (deleted)
Report:
Rule #4: The account avatar being a pony would be “obligatory pony”.
Action Taken:
Image deleted.

User:
Rebel Pirate
Reasons:
Other: Creates fake drama by posting edited images, complains about filterable content, highly confronting about essentially everything and everyone who doesn’t agree with him.
Rule #11: “Evidence” he posts is definitely fake.
Action taken:
User, and associated alt accounts, banned for a week for continual antagonistic behaviour on filterable content, harassment, sockpuppeting.

Image:
>>2730151
Report:
Rule #7: I have no idea what is going on in the comment section. But there seems to be a lot of drama including a user named “Rebel Pirate” accusing an artist of being a pedophile. I think the argument has gone far enough now.
Action Taken:
See above.

Report:
Comment on >>2730151
Reason:
Rule #5: Refusal to use blacklists/trolling/suggesting he wants to dox people.
Action taken:
See above.

Report:
Comment on >>3211389 (deleted)
Reason:
Other: Deserter is Spokenmind93.

It’s her sockpuppet account.
Action taken:
Hahaha, no. Dismissed.