To add, the contention over video games entering the NFT market is future. What happens to your Limited Edition M4A1 skin NFT when Ghost Recon Breakpoint goes tits up? With digital art such as ANoobis’s example, you can continue producing copies as long as a copy remains (which is no different than a non-NFT, another point of contention on the general premise), but if the game that loads the NFT-linked skin no longer exists, all you “own” is a blockchain token that means literally nothing, the record of a now non-existant asset, which is no different than when a market-enabled Steam game goes down and all associated inventories are purged.
And, as a note on NFTs in general, thus far there are no laws backing their existence in the global economy (correct me if I’ve missed a country enacting support). They’re extralegal commerce, all threat and no safety. You bought an ugly monkey NFT and the seller is still making copies? Too bad, unless the country you live in amends their copyright laws to recognize NFT infringement, and technically the original owner still owns it under international copyright law. Ubisoft decides to swap to a different blockchain and you can’t utilize your purchased NFTs anymore and their “value” tanks? K, sorry not sorry, buy more NFTs and roll the dice again.
i actualy wanted preston to give me new settlement locations
What kind of fucking alien are you?