@Twiface
>. These people delude themselves into thinking that they can get Disney to change its ways if they complain loudly and longly enough, but all they really do is enable Disney’s bad behavior by giving them money and publicity.
Certain “fandom menace” culture warriors who existence relies on Disney being bad ultimately fall into a worse trap then that: if Disney were to move positively or have some moments requiring deeper analysis, they can’t acknowledge it because their careers
DEPEND on Disney being the evil woke corporation. It’s sort of like how in some industries that are starting to be dominated by women (like STEM) still have programs, activist, and entire organizations in a mode of operation that it is still 1950. Even if these organizations could still probably justify there existence and have some issues the money from the outrage wouldn’t come in anymore.
>Disney knows that these people will stay on the plantation as long as they get thrown a bone every now and then, and I suspect Disney even incorporates them into its marketing strategy by intentionally riling them up to generate publicity.
Agreed. only note here, I am not sure I would classify, say, a fan focused entity that is negative on the direction of a current franchise but still enjoys some aspects of it under the same definition as this.
>The right thing to do is just to walk away. If everyone did that, then Disney would fade into irrelevance.
At least if you consider Disney evil and a net negative to society (say copyright law, China connection, etc). For me personally, why not very found of Disney, I don’t attempt to boycott it like I do with Amazon or Google. Sometimes family members take me to movies and show me media of theirs and I still have a moderate interest in Star Wars (albeit, not sure if Disney has made any money from me personally in the last 10 years).