>"treatment" section is about a paragraph long, and there's not a lot too it.
It's two paragraphs long, checkmate, you lose! Obviously joking here!
>, it's an entire SECTION of Wikipedia. If you think of Wikipedia as this storage center, all the other discrimination articles are akin to a few pages of paperwork in a box in one of the storage garages.
In all seriousness, I will have to look deeper into this. I would think, antisemitism having a dedicated section or not, racism and LGBT discrimination would still top or be equal in actual content devoted to it but I could be wrong. Honestly, could be fun to dive deep into Wikipedia on a off weekend.
> Then they go on to talk about 'new antisemitism'. which one of the prime examples they say is opposing the state of Israel. Meaning you're not allowed to criticize it
In this, we are in partial agreement. They often do try to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism to a overly broad degree. Though I would say the same with opposition to Critical Race Theory being equated with racism and how all of idenity politics works nowadays. Not to mention legit criticism of US foreign and domestic policy being written off as anti-American. I see it as bad, but not quite as unique.
>Additional fun fact. If you type in Google 'Jewish Discrimination', it will autocomplete an addition at the end; 'Lawyers'. As if you need a specific type of lawyer for discrimination. As if this type of discrimination is somehow special.
I get the same with black, transgender and lesbian don't give it as a option and hispanic has it lower on the list, at least for me.
I mean, it is possible we might need a whitelist of those who didn't over a blacklist, at least for ultra large companies.
The Supreme Court seemed poised on Wednesday to uphold a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, based on sometimes tense and heated questioning at a momentous argument in the most important abortion case in decades.Abortions prior to 15 weeks are still legal under the Mississippi bill. That's 95% of all abortions. 60% of all abortions are within the first 8 weeks and 77% are within the first 10 weeks.
Such a ruling would be flatly at odds with what the court has said was the central holding of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion and prohibited states from banning the procedure before fetal viability, or around 23 weeks.
But the court’s six-member conservative majority seemed divided about whether to stop at 15 weeks, for now at least, or whether to overrule Roe entirely, allowing states to ban abortions at any time or entirely.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. was the leading voice on the right for a narrow decision. “The thing that is at issue before us today is 15 weeks,” he said.
Justice Breyer quoted from Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 decision that reaffirmed what it called Roe’s core holding, the one prohibiting states from banning abortions before fetal viability: “To overrule under fire in the absence of the most compelling reason to re-examine a watershed decision would subvert the court’s legitimacy beyond any serious question.”That's EXACTLY what they did with the gay marriage thing, though. The first ruling said "The federal government cannot dictate to the states whether they can or cannot have gay marriage." Then the issue was kicked to the states and they all outlawed it, even far left Commifornia. Then gay judges overturned the plebiscites that won with veto-proof majorities in every state based on personal opinion and not legal precedent, as several admitted in their rulings, and leftoids giggled and clapped "Yay! The people have spoken!" (actual quote). Then when 30 states had their plebiscites overruled by gay judges it was kicked back to SCOTUS and they then ruled "The states cannot decide whether they can or cannot have gay marriage, only the federal government can, and we say it's legal. YOLO SWAG! LOL!"
The English, on the other hand, had really poor judgment when it came to some designs.Like they've had, and still have poor judgement with 99% of their military gear?