Big Bad Politics!

Anonymous #0847
I can’t find this article, but I don’t doubt it’s true with how fast they demanded everyone take their jab now they had the power to do so and with how the mandate was halted with the Christmas season apparently being more important then saving Grandma they all said and now the 5th circuit pretty much put it dead in the water.  
full
 
Uncle Joe has a 100% failure rate.
Anonymous #372F
Allegedly the jury was filmed. If true, I strongly suspect Kyle will be convicted through intimidation of the jury. That’s in addition to the alleged threats to burn down the city.
Etherium-Apex
Artist -
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

@Anonymous #372F  
I think that was actually brought up during the trial, and I also recall the defense moving for a mistrial with prejudice. In any case, if they are threatened into voting guilty, the judge can overrule it with a directed verdict if he feels that the jury has been tampered with.
Anonymous #372F
@Etherium-Apex  
The judge is another thing I’ve been pondering. I know a lot of BLM/Antifa supporters are trying to prove the judge is biased toward the defense. Assuming Kyle does (rightfully) go free, I wonder if double jeopardy would still apply if the judge was declared unfit for the case after the fact?
Etherium-Apex
Artist -
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

@Anonymous #372F  
The judge has done a pretty good job of remaining impartial and fair, and that’s exactly why the far left Bolsheviks hate him and want him removed. If you’re not willing to steamroll their agenda and lynch people for resisting, you’re unfit in their eyes. Anything that isn’t blatantly biased in their favor is considered unfair.
 
Thankfully though, the real world doesn’t take social media complaints as hard enough evidence to remove a judge. His job is safe.
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

Thankfully though, the real world doesn’t take social media complaints as hard enough evidence to remove a judge. His job is safe.
There are far too many examples of the screeching leftoids resulting in people losing their jobs to be sure of that.
Etherium-Apex
Artist -
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

@Barhandar  
Of course, plenty of people have lost their jobs to leftoid screeching, but there’s a difference between a normal employee job and being an acting judge. It’s not so simple as going “this judge offended me” and then the judge being fired. Even Brett Kavanaugh is still a Supreme Court judge despite the mountain of screeching and home vandalism he faced.
Barhandar
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained (Cheeky Breeky)

@Wingnut  
The problem with that postulate is that it’s still just “meek” in russian translation (which was directly from hebrew+greek), it didn’t have King James’ and the rest of catholics’ shenanigans.
 
Also pretty sure none of the Americans are inheriting the Earth anyway, because they’re either swinging their swords without just cause, or refusing to even though the time to has come.
UrbanMysticDee
Chatty Kirin - A user who has reached a combined 1000 forum posts or comments.
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

Bae > Bay
full  
full
 
One of them is a psychotic, corrupt, evil district attorney who is out for blood.
 
The other is Gary Oldman playing the villain in one of the best movies ever made.
 
Which is which?
Anonymous #372F
@UrbanMysticDee  
I’m surprised the Judge didn’t object to him pointing a rifle at the jury, especially when Baldwin had a ND with a supposedly empty gun barely three weeks ago.
TheBridge
Boot badge - It's Bootiful
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

I know NOTHING
@Anonymous #D018  
>Library of Alexandria  
That is actually a lot more complex with a lot of competing accounts. The first person to be accused of burning down the library was Julius Caesar, usually sometimes villianiously and sometimes accidentally (if it happened at all). Then you have the Christians attacking Serapeum temple, which may have had the library books destroyed during the attack, but I have seen this disputed as well from a lack of an accounts of other libraries being destroyed during the anti pagan edicts issued at the time  
No ancient sources mention the destruction of any library at this time, though 18th century English historian Edward Gibbon mistakenly attributes it to bishop Theophilus.
 
but I still think it is a fair point, just not as dramtic. And most scholarship disputes Islam destroying it as well now from my understanding, I have seen others running with it though. To further quote the linked article  
The last suggested perpetrator of the crime is the Caliph Omar. In 640 CE the Arabs under General Amrou ibn el-Ass, captured Alexandria after a long siege. According to the story, the conquering Arabs heard about a magnificent library containing all the knowledge of the world and were anxious to see it. But the Caliph, unmoved by this vast collection of learning, apparently stated ‘they will either contradict the Koran, in which case they are heresy, or they will agree with it, so they are superfluous.’
The manuscripts were then gathered together and used as fuel for the 4,000 bathhouses in the city. In fact there were so many scrolls that they kept the bathhouses of Alexandria heated for six months. These incredible facts were written down 300 years after the supposed event by Christian polymath Gregory Bar Hebraeus1 (1226-1286 CE). However, while the Arabs may have destroyed a Christian library at Alexandria, it is almost certain that by the mid 7th century CE the Royal Library no longer existed. This is made clear by the fact that no mention is made of such a catastrophic event by contemporary writers such as Christian chronicler John of Nikiou, Byzantine monk and writer John Moschus and Sophronius, Patriarch of Jerusalem.
 
Funny thing, have seen many believe that it was internal enemies of the who may have initially spread this and not Christians. Source, warning long PDF of a book from  
The myth of the Arab destruction of the Library of Alexandria is not supported by even a fabricated document. One may wonder what purpose it served. One answer, often given and certainly in accord with a currently popular school of epistemology would see the story as anti-Islamic propaganda, designed by hostile elements to blacken the good name of Islam by showing the revered Caliph {Umar as a destroyer of libraries. But this explanation is as absurd as the myth itself. The original sources of the story are Muslim, the only exception being the Syrian-Christian Barhebraeus1, who copied it from a Muslim author. Not the creation, but the demolition of the myth was the achievement of European orientalist scholarship, which from the eighteenth century to the present day has rejected the story as false and absurd, and thus exonerated the Caliph {Umar and the early Muslims from this libel.
 
Now, I don’t want to cast myself as a expert on the issue. I am trying to couple togather stuff that I have heard from moderate level research long ago from the hieght of the atheism vs religion austism on the internet. Bias and framing abound from all sides and this can be sliced in nurmous different ways. Though I find the fixation of the Library of Alexsandria and it’s reduction to a be a anti-Christain narritive in itself.  
Passions still run high on this matter. When Glen Bowersock first invited me to present this paper, I hesitated because of a traumaticearly experience. I wrote an article on the Alexandrian Library oncommission for a short-lived magazine called The Dial, published for Channel 13. The editor did not like my caution about the accounts of the destruction of the Library and, without telling me, rewrote the arti-cle to blame everything squarely on the Christians.38 Whether he hated Christianity or just liked a simple story line, I do not know. The matter is, truth to tell, not so clear.39 The subject has been end-lessly debated by modern scholars, but with little result. There was certainly still some substantial library in Roman Alexandria. This is evidentfrom Suetonius’s life of Domitian (20), where we learn that he replacedbooks lost to fire in Roman libraries in part by sending scribes to Alex-andria to copy manuscripts there.40 And some of the scholarly workthat went on in the Roman period in Alexandria is difficult to imaginewithout a substantial library. As the Museum was certainly still operative in the Roman period, belief in a Caesarian destruction of the Library requires the uneconomical assumption that the Library was destroyed in the fire but the Museum was not.
 
Source (again, warning PDF!).
 
there is no historical evidence for his existence  
Speaking of bias. It sounds like you are drawing your arugemnts from Richard Carrier or Kenneth Humphreys. I am not going to scream unrealiable source or say “fringe!” like even the mainstream secular scholars do at Jesus mythism, which I do dislike as a Christain, for the whole flaw upon our modern memestream society is the memestream pushing upon “crediabiiity” and “trustworthy” sources while tripping up and making thousands of errors. Recyling their arugemnts in totality I would advice strongly against even if you are peek fadora though.
UrbanMysticDee
Chatty Kirin - A user who has reached a combined 1000 forum posts or comments.
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

Bae > Bay
Emmanuel Macron changed the color of the French flag. In the 70s some frog changed the flag to match the blue of the EU flag because he was a eurofag and last week or so Macron changed it back to the original 1790s colors. It looks better. The blue is deeper, richer, more powerful. The EU blue is more faggoty.
Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide