TheBridge
I know NOTHING
"@Psy Key":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=58994#post_58994
>"treatment" section is about a paragraph long, and there's not a lot too it.
It's two paragraphs long, checkmate, you lose! [spoiler]Obviously joking here![/spoiler]
>, it's an entire SECTION of Wikipedia. If you think of Wikipedia as this storage center, all the other discrimination articles are akin to a few pages of paperwork in a box in one of the storage garages.
In all seriousness, I will have to look deeper into this. I would think, antisemitism having a dedicated section or not, racism and LGBT discrimination would still top or be equal in actual content devoted to it but I could be wrong. Honestly, could be fun to dive deep into Wikipedia on a off weekend.
> Then they go on to talk about 'new antisemitism'. which one of the prime examples they say is opposing the state of Israel. Meaning you're not allowed to criticize it
In this, we are in partial agreement. They often do try to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism to a overly broad degree. Though I would say the same with opposition to Critical Race Theory being equated with racism and how all of idenity politics works nowadays. Not to mention legit criticism of US foreign and domestic policy being written off as anti-American. I see it as bad, but not as quite as unique.
>Additional fun fact. If you type in Google 'Jewish Discrimination', it will autocomplete an addition at the end; 'Lawyers'. As if you need a specific type of lawyer for discrimination. As if this type of discrimination is somehow special.
I get the same with black, transgender and lesbian don't give it as a option and hispanic has it lower on the list, at least for me.
"@Humble Oriathan":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=59048#post_59048
I mean, it is possible we might need a whitelist of those who didn't over a blacklist, at least for ultra large companies.
>"treatment" section is about a paragraph long, and there's not a lot too it.
It's two paragraphs long, checkmate, you lose! [spoiler]Obviously joking here![/spoiler]
>, it's an entire SECTION of Wikipedia. If you think of Wikipedia as this storage center, all the other discrimination articles are akin to a few pages of paperwork in a box in one of the storage garages.
In all seriousness, I will have to look deeper into this. I would think, antisemitism having a dedicated section or not, racism and LGBT discrimination would still top or be equal in actual content devoted to it but I could be wrong. Honestly, could be fun to dive deep into Wikipedia on a off weekend.
> Then they go on to talk about 'new antisemitism'. which one of the prime examples they say is opposing the state of Israel. Meaning you're not allowed to criticize it
In this, we are in partial agreement. They often do try to equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism to a overly broad degree. Though I would say the same with opposition to Critical Race Theory being equated with racism and how all of idenity politics works nowadays. Not to mention legit criticism of US foreign and domestic policy being written off as anti-American. I see it as bad, but not as quite as unique.
>Additional fun fact. If you type in Google 'Jewish Discrimination', it will autocomplete an addition at the end; 'Lawyers'. As if you need a specific type of lawyer for discrimination. As if this type of discrimination is somehow special.
I get the same with black, transgender and lesbian don't give it as a option and hispanic has it lower on the list, at least for me.
"@Humble Oriathan":/forums/dis/topics/big-bad-politics?post_id=59048#post_59048
I mean, it is possible we might need a whitelist of those who didn't over a blacklist, at least for ultra large companies.