Uploaded by Anonymous #5916
 1000x600 JPG 140 kB 913 Views

Description:

Slice of life in United States. 🇺🇸
semi-grimdark37126 artist:slamjam649 edit166340 big macintosh34232 lyra heartstrings34923 marble pie8561 pinkie pie261206 soarin'17913 sugar belle3730 earth pony600145 pegasus666637 pony1848866 unicorn654938 /mlp/10780 ar15308 crying54540 current events259 female1626069 incelpie19 male486906 mare879026 op is trying to start shit3159 parody17125 reversed gender roles equestria189 school2366 school shooting36 shooting645 stallion172455 texas126 too soon46 united states1232 we are going to hell733 weapon40752

Source:

not provided yet

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

πʊßƛįϰ

@Amagan  
It’s probably a repeal of BS mandatory reporting laws that have a nasty habit of causing more problems than they solve. So many of the threats turn out to be nothingburgers that the genuine threat is ignored. Mandatory reporting mandates crying wolf over obvious nonsense.
Amagan

Well this is a real kicker. What does California do in response to a school shooting? SB1273 ladies and gentlement. Eliminating Law Enforcement Mandates in School. What does it do?
 
>Eliminating state mandates for school notification of law enforcement of many types of incidents, thereby empowering schools to adopt non-punitive, supportive, trauma-informed and health-based approaches to school related behaviors.
 
>Increasing educator discretion in determining when to notify law enforcement about a student’s school related behaviors.
 
>Eliminating prosecution of school staff who fail to report incidents of alleged assaults or physical threats against school employees.
 
>Eliminating the criminal penalty for students for the “willful disturbance” of public schools and public school meetings.
 
California’s idea for responding to school shootings is to stop notifying law enforcement of when students make threats to shoot up a school. Brilliant, just brilliant.
Amagan

@Anonymous #9CA3  
Their position is, that if you don’t spend all of your time actively and vocally condemning something as being unacceptable, then your silence makes you implicitly supportive of the act. There’s absolutely no wiggle room on the matter, you’re either for it or against it. And if you don’t speak up quickly enough, and loudly enough, your hesitation means you’re as guilty as the guilty party who did the wrongful deed.
 
Basically their stance is “Give up your constitutional rights to prove to us that you aren’t really murderers and support the killing of children!”
Anonymous #9CA3
@Anonymous #EF7A  
Assuming this is true, most Rs support the 2A so why would they celebrate tragedies that both take innocent lives and stoke contempt for the US Constitution? School shootings being bad is something pretty much everyone agrees on, it’s the reaction to them that’s divisive.
 
Unless your point is about people toward the right being more tolerant of offensive humor or something, which would be a dumb point but I guess it’s possible.
Adán Druego
A toast - Incredibly based
Chatty Kirin - A user who has reached a combined 1000 forum posts or comments.
Fried Chicken - Attended an april fools event
Artist -
Liberty Belle - Sings the song of the unchained

@Anonymous #EF7A  
Republicans don’t support people acting like animals and ruining the lives of the innocent. That’s obviously a democrat kind of thing, which is why they support blm, open borders, transgender groomers and wannabe communist brats like those antifa freaks. I mean look at all the undesirables, the democrats having been baiting over the past few years, blacks, that act like stupid animals, mentally ill crossdressers, who flaunt their kinks in public and so many self hating whites with guilt issues.
 
Basically, derpibooru…
Anonymous #EF7A
I’m surprised that this post got so many downvotes, isn’t most of Ponybooru users are Republican supporters?
ponypony221
Chatty Kirin -

Excessively based homo
Arguing over “control” of guns we all know the right will never use to free/protect themselves is just another distraction from the real issue in the west.
 
If the government really wanted to take your guns, they would, just like in Australia. There is no need for some drug-addled Alex Jones conspiracy to affect public opinion. Public opinion would already support the act. Almost everyone on the right would hand their guns over willingly and proclaim they’ll “vote them out” next time. The rest, which they already have in a database, would be Waco’d. We already did this with “machine guns,” silencers, and bump stocks.
 
The government isn’t threatened by your civilian model semi-auto rifle you can’t afford ammo for to begin with. They have APCs. They really love you think having that gun will protect you from them, though. It keeps you docile while they replace you.
Anonymous #9CA3
@AlsoSprachOdin  
The story is that at the time he was arrested he had a tan or something and the police officer who booked him supposedly mistook him for a latino. Kid is white as rice.
Anonymous #3511
@Amagan  
He looks white enough at first glance, and Americans are pretty good at trying to pass whatever they can as “white” to fit a certain narrative.