Uploaded by Anonymous #5916
1000x600 JPG 140 kB 913 ViewsDescription:
Slice of life in United States. 🇺🇸
+-SH semi-grimdark37126 +-SH artist:slamjam649 +-SH edit166340 +-SH big macintosh34232 +-SH lyra heartstrings34923 +-SH marble pie8561 +-SH pinkie pie261206 +-SH soarin'17913 +-SH sugar belle3730 +-SH earth pony600145 +-SH pegasus666637 +-SH pony1848866 +-SH unicorn654938 +-SH /mlp/10780 +-SH ar15308 +-SH crying54540 +-SH current events259 +-SH female1626069 +-SH incelpie19 +-SH male486906 +-SH mare879026 +-SH op is trying to start shit3159 +-SH parody17125 +-SH reversed gender roles equestria189 +-SH school2366 +-SH school shooting36 +-SH shooting645 +-SH stallion172455 +-SH texas126 +-SH too soon46 +-SH united states1232 +-SH we are going to hell733 +-SH weapon40752
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
What do you expect? California’s cure for HIV was to make it legal to knowingly infect people with HIV.
It’s probably a repeal of BS mandatory reporting laws that have a nasty habit of causing more problems than they solve. So many of the threats turn out to be nothingburgers that the genuine threat is ignored. Mandatory reporting mandates crying wolf over obvious nonsense.
>Eliminating state mandates for school notification of law enforcement of many types of incidents, thereby empowering schools to adopt non-punitive, supportive, trauma-informed and health-based approaches to school related behaviors.
>Increasing educator discretion in determining when to notify law enforcement about a student’s school related behaviors.
>Eliminating prosecution of school staff who fail to report incidents of alleged assaults or physical threats against school employees.
>Eliminating the criminal penalty for students for the “willful disturbance” of public schools and public school meetings.
California’s idea for responding to school shootings is to stop notifying law enforcement of when students make threats to shoot up a school. Brilliant, just brilliant.
Their position is, that if you don’t spend all of your time actively and vocally condemning something as being unacceptable, then your silence makes you implicitly supportive of the act. There’s absolutely no wiggle room on the matter, you’re either for it or against it. And if you don’t speak up quickly enough, and loudly enough, your hesitation means you’re as guilty as the guilty party who did the wrongful deed.
Basically their stance is “Give up your constitutional rights to prove to us that you aren’t really murderers and support the killing of children!”
Edited
Assuming this is true, most Rs support the 2A so why would they celebrate tragedies that both take innocent lives and stoke contempt for the US Constitution? School shootings being bad is something pretty much everyone agrees on, it’s the reaction to them that’s divisive.
Unless your point is about people toward the right being more tolerant of offensive humor or something, which would be a dumb point but I guess it’s possible.
That’s why the republicans keep losing. Intentionally. This is a war and only one side wants to fight.
Republicans don’t support people acting like animals and ruining the lives of the innocent. That’s obviously a democrat kind of thing, which is why they support blm, open borders, transgender groomers and wannabe communist brats like those antifa freaks. I mean look at all the undesirables, the democrats having been baiting over the past few years, blacks, that act like stupid animals, mentally ill crossdressers, who flaunt their kinks in public and so many self hating whites with guilt issues.
Basically, derpibooru…
Republicans don’t support school shootings.
That’s why the Ted pill is the most important pill of all. It’s also neat because it keeps out the brainlets.
If the government really wanted to take your guns, they would, just like in Australia. There is no need for some drug-addled Alex Jones conspiracy to affect public opinion. Public opinion would already support the act. Almost everyone on the right would hand their guns over willingly and proclaim they’ll “vote them out” next time. The rest, which they already have in a database, would be Waco’d. We already did this with “machine guns,” silencers, and bump stocks.
The government isn’t threatened by your civilian model semi-auto rifle you can’t afford ammo for to begin with. They have APCs. They really love you think having that gun will protect you from them, though. It keeps you docile while they replace you.
Rosenbaum was jewish
So are the criminals he killed at the time because they were trying to kill him. But to hear BLM talk you’d think it was a bunch of blacks that Rittenhouse shot.
The story is that at the time he was arrested he had a tan or something and the police officer who booked him supposedly mistook him for a latino. Kid is white as rice.
Your comment is debunked.
What’s debunked? There was no shooting and it’s all a figment of our collective mass psychosis?
@AlsoSprachOdin
The polite term is “beaner-X”
I thought he was part latino.
Rittenhouse is actually white though, to be fair. He clarified it in an interview after his trial.
Like Zimmerman, or Eliot Roger. Or Kyle Rittenhouse.
He looks white enough at first glance, and Americans are pretty good at trying to pass whatever they can as “white” to fit a certain narrative.
>too soon
No it’s not/debunked
Edited
@Anonymous #9669
Only if she’s also a catmare.